Friday, July 09, 2021

Most People Are Amoral Whores


No, most people aren’t sociopaths. 

But it isn’t just that they are passive servants of Evil, and it isn’t just that they flatly refuse to risk anything to resist Evil in real life. 

A clear majority of people’s monkey brains are very actively focused on identifying what the society in which they live approves of and disapproves of, so they can obey that, so they can get rewarded for their obedience, like good little doggies.

Another several percent of people are far more Evil than Good.

Considering the fact of that social environment, the people who are far more Evil than Good are inevitably going to be very over-represented in positions of decision-making power.

At least a few percent, and maybe several, are very Good in some ways, but also very Evil in some ways. If they win, Evil keeps winning, just in a slightly different form. Not a net gain.

That leaves about 15 percent of people who are some mix of Good and Evil that they don’t fit into any of the other three categories. But the vast majority of them are certainly not saints.

Sunday, January 13, 2019

When Female Sociopaths Hijacked Feminism

Short Answer: it was 1963.

Longer Answer:

The Dark Ages
Also known as the 1950’s (which are also known – to Conservatives – as “the good old days”). Actually, for a long time before that. A looong time. You pretty much have to go back to before Monotheism to find a time when human sexuality was not repressed. (Read Joseph Campbell’s accounts of the pagan sex cults; whew, our ancestors did a whole lotta love'n! But I digress…)
 
The First Wave
The first wave of Feminism had been about getting women to be recognized and treated as fully human in everyday life and under the law. This was good; I, as most people today, accept that as a legitimate goal. (As most young women today accept, it has largely been achieved.)


The Pill
The birth control pill (so impactful it is known simply as “The Pill”, despite the millions of types of pills in our society) was approved for married women in some states in 1960; every year after that, the number of women who could get it – both legally and illegally – increased every year until every adult and most teens get could get on it by the early seventies. This absolutely caused the Sexual Revolution, the way that it actually happened, when it actually happened (despite the protestations of some). Yes, there were psycho-social changes happening already, and something would have happened, but The Pill had a huge effect on America and the world.

(The Pill has been reformulated a few times since, and today is very safe and very effective – if taken as prescribed – for women ages 18 – 30.)


The Sociopaths/Psychopaths
"They are everyone, and they are no one." Morpheus, The Matrix

Movies and TV have given most people a false impression of what a psychopath is; the whole “Hannibal Lecter / Silence of the Lambs” thing.

In reality, most sociopaths (psychopaths are a subset of sociopaths) are not serial killers or even in prison. They are doctors, lawyers, nurses, teachers.. every kind of person. Rich and poor; young and old; Black, White, and Asian. They are Conservative and Liberal; Democrat and Republican; Capitalist and Communist. Every category, every place, every group has some.

Including the Feminist Movement.

The Feminist Mistake and The Biological Clock
The female sociopath cannot get human fulfillment from the "traditional" roles of  wife and mother. To her, those healthy, natural roles feel like a prison, and a trap, and like she's being unjustly persecuted.

In 1963, Betty Friedan released her book The Feminine Mystique. Friedan had been an activist for many years by that point; she was also a woman “of privilege”, living in a large house with several servants. Her wealthy husband hired a nanny to look after their children, and a maid to take care of their house, so she could travel the USA complaining about how oppressed she was.

[The NYT obituary for Friedan noted that she was "famously abrasive", and that she could be "thin-skinned and imperious, subject to screaming fits of temperament." Her husband said, "It took a driven, super aggressive, egocentric, almost lunatic dynamo to rock the world the way she did. Unfortunately, she was that same person at home, where that kind of conduct doesn't work. She simply never understood this." Germaine Greer stated Betty "would become breathless with outrage if she didn't get the deference she thought she deserved." That's the malignant narcissism which is typical of the psychopathic personality.]


So, since most women have to choose one or the other at a time, Feminism teaches them to put off marriage and children in favor of pursuing a career (mocking women who don’t as pursuing an “MRS” degree). This is not what’s best for most women – or their children – because the 20’s are the biologically best time to be getting pregnant and giving birth. Most women’s fertility starts to decrease after age 30, and decreases every year after that. If you spend all your 20’s going to college and then establishing your career, you are acting like a man. It’s OK for men to do that – we don’t get pregnant.
 
The Fish Needs A Bicycle
The man gives the woman what she values most, which is his love; the woman gives the man what he values most, her power. If the man gives his love for any amount of time, and then at some point stops giving it, then she should “stop giving away her power.” If the man gives her his love before she gives him her power, she will not be able to feel respect for him, then she will not be able to feel attracted to him.

If the woman gives the man both her power and her love – hey, that’s great. But if she gives her love but not her power, that relationship is doomed.


Female sociopaths, calling themselves feminists, point to examples of male sociopaths being psychopathic toward non-'path women, and misrepresent it as typical of how "men" treat "women" (the Patriarchy).

Modern (i.e., psychopathic) Feminism drops all of this context, and tells women “Stop giving away your power”, as an absolute. This makes it a vicious attack on healthy heterosexuality.

 
The Twilight of the Vampires
Vampire = sociopath = defective and inferior.

They are not heroes, they do not have superpowers, and there is no such thing as a good sociopath who fights the bad sociopaths because he loves a girl. The idyllic romance ‘tween Bella and whatz-his-name is the Trojan horse inside which that lie got smuggled into a generation of girls' minds.

No, vampires/sociopaths don’t have fangs, or sleep in coffins, or burst into flames in the sunlight. That’s entertainment industry bullshit.

There has been a huge push in recent years for psychopaths and sociopaths, to portray them as just regular fellas (Sopranos), cool and interesting (Mad Men), doing justice – unlike those incompetent cops (Dexter), and even an oppressed minority (True Blood).

Just because they find themselves fascinating doesn’t mean you have to.


Thursday, August 31, 2017

My Tax Plan

INTRODUCING THE GRADUATED FLAT TAX

50% on all income beyond the first $15,000 per year. 

(NO separate rate for "Capital Gains." There is no justification for that.)

Someone making $15K would pay zero.

$20K - $15K = $5000 divided by 2 = $2500 = 12.5%.

$25K - $15K = $10K / 2 = $5000 = 20%.

$65K - $15K = $50K / 2 = $25K = 38%.

$115K - $15K = $100K / 2 = $50K = 43%.

$915K - $15K = $900K / 2 = $450K = 49%.

$1 Million & 15K - $15 = $1M / 2 = $500K = 49.9%.

Now, some will say this is "punishing success." No, it's punishing greed, while being easy on the poor and fair to the middle class. Justice!

CHILD TAX CREDIT

$4K per year for the first child, $3K / year for the 2nd kid, $2K / year for the 3rd, and $1K for the 4th.

If you can afford more kids, go for it. If you can't .. don't have them! We must not reward irresponsibility.

WHAT ABOUT THE HOUSE DEDUCTION?

A clear majority of Americans can no longer afford a medium size house in good repair in a safe quiet neighborhood not more than an hour's drive from employment and shopping. (Isn't that part of what "middle class" used to mean, before it got redefined down over and over again?)

Partly that's because of the decimation of the middle class's income by inflation, but it's also partly because of the simultaneous explosion in house prices. And that explosion in prices was partly because of the giant house deduction (which helped the most ruthless monkeys a lot more than "regular Americans".) We need to rethink that.

Wednesday, July 05, 2017

Some Perspective On The Healthcare Reform SCAM

More than half of the improvement in health from 150 years ago 'til now is just from public sanitation (clean fresh water into homes & businesses, the sewer system, and garbage collection service).

Most of the rest is just from hygiene (doctors washing hands between patients is an application of preventing cross-contamination, same as we all routinely do in food preparation).

Those two together are responsible for more than 76% of the total improvement. The remaining less than 24% is split roughly equally between:


  • Police & Fire departments
  • Improvements in civil engineering (buildings & bridges don't collapse; compare to many recent news stories from 3rd world countries)
  • Laws & regulations that intervene in the marketplace to reduce the freedom of some people to maximize their profits by poisoning us all with pollution.
  • Alleviation of rank malnutrition (somewhat walked back over the past few decades by the anti-science Cult of the Low Fat Diet).
  • The Medical Sector of the economy, which markets itself as "healthcare".


So, healthcare accounts for less than 10%, and probably closer to 5% of the total improvement in health from 150 years ago til now. But wait, it's even worse than that! Virtually 100% of healthcare's contribution is just from the ER. You get shot or stabbed, or suffer from smoke inhalation during a house fire, or something like that; all through human history until recently, that would have ended your life. Now they can prevent your death until you have time to heal, and you might live for decades more.

In other words, the effect of everything else that healthcare does - vaccines, cholesterol-lowering drugs, anti-depression medications, the cut/poison/burn business model of cancer treatment (surgery/chemo/radiation), etc. - does not rise to statistical significance.

BOTTOM LINE: We, the USA, get literally NOTHING in return for MOST of the money we as a nation spend on "healthcare" every year.

The Dreaded "Socialized Medicine"

Yes, we should have a single-payer national healthcare system - but ONLY for the ER. This would save our country bigly money, and improve the lives of millions of people. (ONLY for citizens, of course.)

For long-term health creation and maintenance, the medical sector of the economy, as currently constituted, is actively harmful.

Fortunately, there are things you as an individual can do to take care of your own health & fitness:

How to sync diet with exercise

Most cancer can be prevented with nutrition

An easy AND FREE way to reduce and maybe even eliminate back pain

Drug-free ways to raise your testosterone

Signaling: the science of nutrigenomics - no DNA test required!

Saturday, June 10, 2017

Diminishing Returns, Pareto's Principle, and Zeno's (Xeno's) Paradox

The Law of Diminishing Returns: The rate at which the increase in cost decreases is lower than the rate at which the increase in benefit decreases.

As teh interwebz says, "Few understand this."

An Example

One is a certain amount. Two is twice as much as one. Three is only 50% more than two. Four is only 25% more than three. Five is only 20% more than four.

Are you starting to notice a pattern? This can help you get the "most bang for your buck."

The 80/20 Rule 

A few centuries ago, an Italian accountant noticed that 20% of the population owned 80% of the wealth. Scrutinizing that 20% further, he saw that 20% of the 20% had 80% of the 80%.

This has since been found to hold true in many areas of life.

You can apply this to exercise; lifting one day a week should give you about 80% of the benefit of lifting 5 days a week. That can free up your schedule tremendously.

But Wait, There's More!

The 80/20 rule is a specific application; the Law of Diminishing Returns may manifest differently in other situations.

Let's say doing something six times gives you the maximum benefit you could get from doing that thing.

Doing it once might get you 25% of doing it 6 times. Twice might get you up to 50% of 6 times. Three times = 70%, four times = 85%, five times = 95%.

In that case, doing it 6 times would give 100%, no? Actually, no. Six times is 96%, 7 times is 97%, 8 times is 98%, 9 times is 99%.

So, 10 times is 100% of doing it six times?! Still wrong! Ten times is 99.1%

Bake Your Noodle

Eleven times is 99.11%. Gosh, this is starting to seem like Xeno's Paradox.

The closer you get to perfection, the more inefficient the effort becomes. Appreciating the Law of Diminishing Returns can save you wasted resources in real life.

Mmmm, Pie

Of course, if you sit down to eat a pie, the first two bites won't reduce the pie by half; if you eat 100% of the pie, you've eaten 100% of the pie.

The Law of Diminishing Returns and Xeno's Paradox don't apply to absolutely everything!

Monday, September 12, 2016

What Do Women Find Attractive In Men?

We men have long used a 1-10 scale to rank women on their hotness / desirability. Women (and men) have lacked a comparable scale for men, because what women find attractive in men is a bit more complicated. Well, I figured it out for you, and here it is:


The Score for Men

  • Height
  • Intelligence
  • Shoulders
  • Waist
  • Some Muscle
  • Middle-Class Money or above
  • Social Proof / Fame
  • High-Status Job
  • Good Looks
  • Personal Behavior / Game


Each is worth one point out of ten. So what’s your score?

Wednesday, July 06, 2016

When Did This Happen?

Did many years of "history".. never happen?!

There has been a stable and persistent cycle of 200 years warming and 200 years cooling for at least the past 1,800 years. Unusual events like comet dust or a major volcanic eruption are not needed to explain the wave-like behavior of civilization over time. (Such things happen, but are incidental and/or have the same - cosmic - cause.)

Official History has been at pains - and gone through some absurd contortions - to obscure this.

[Note: Events of 375 - 500 actually took place from 375 - 400, and Dark Ages was 400 not 500 years. In other words, it's been closer to 1,800 years than 2,016 years since year one of the Current Era (CE/"AD").]

1 - 200: Warming

The Roman Empire is doing well, expanding and stable.

200 - 400: Cooling

Food production declines, Roman Empire spread too thin, fractures into East & West. By 375, growing season gets too short in Northern part of temperate zone to sustain tribes, Volkerwanderung/"wandering of peoples" (deliberately misleading), hundreds of thousands of (hungry) people all descending on Roman Empire en masse from N. Europe & N. Central Asia (Huns).

By 400, W. Roman Empire ceases to exist qua Roman Empire.

400 - 600: Warming (corresponds to 500 - 700 of Official History)

First half of "Dark Ages." Warming period could have enabled increased food production leading to increase in population in Europe (as happened later), but recent collapse of civilization meant they could not take advantage of it.

The Muslims took advantage of it by expanding rapidly throughout the Middle East, across N. Africa, and up into Spain.

600 - 800: Cooling (corresponds to 700 - early 900's of Official history)

In the first half of this cooling period, Charles Martel stopped the Islamic expansion into France, and his grandson Charlemagne followed on from this by conquering France, Germany, and N. Italy. As the cooling continued, however, Charlemagne's progeny were not able to hold his empire together.

By the end of the first century of this cooling period, the Vikings had begun their raiding, driven south by lack of food. The progressing cold in their homelands pushed them farther and farther South and East (to Constantinople) throughout the 2nd century of the period; many Vikings switched from raiding to settling down, esp. in the British Isles & N. France.

800 - 1000: Warming (corresponds to mid 900's - 1200 of Official History)

The vaunted Medieval Warm Period (MWP). Charlemagne's conquering had Christianized most of W. Europe, restoring some stability relative to the immediate post-collapse era. Thus, they were able to make use of the warming this time, greatly increasing food supply & more than doubling the population.

By the end of this warming period, the Vikings had settled Greenland (h/t Razib Khan for this link, via @hbdchick), and reached N. America.

1000 - 1200: Cooling (corresponds to 1200 - 1400 of Official History)

For nearly the first half of this cooling period, Europeans (esp. Western) rode the momentum of the Medieval Warm Period. By the "1290's" (of the Official Chronology), that had run out, and the situation went bad fast.

The 2nd half of this cooling period ("the 1300's"/actually 1100's) is described by modern historians as "disastrous", "horrific", and a time of "crisis" & "catastrophe". I suspect some significant minority of the deaths attributed to the Black Death were directly and/or indirectly from the drastic drop in food supply, itself directly caused by the cooling, which was quite severe by 3/4's the way through this 200 year  period.

It was also the time when the "Hundred Years War" started; the Official History will only admit to social and economic causes, usually downplaying or ignoring the cold weather.

1200 - 1400: Warming (corresponds to 1400 - 1600 of Official History)

The first half of this warming period saw the Renaissance, starting in Italy.

In the 2nd half of this warming period, the Europeans began sailing all over the earth.

1400 - 1600: Cooling (corresponds to 1600 - 1800 of Official History)

Again, like with the first century of cooling after the MWP, the European peoples were enjoying the momentum from the previous warming period as the planet began cooling. And again, throughout the 2nd half of the cooling, as cold weather decreased food production, social & economic pressures continued to build up on the governments of the day. This led to the American and French revolutions. (Think of the famous painting of George Washington standing in the boat, with boulder-sized chunks of ice floating in the river.)

The use of the term "Little Ice Age" is (again, deliberately) misleading, as it implies an unusual - or at least very rare - occurrence. In fact, as you've just seen, it is quite usual. There is this 200 year cooling period every 400 years - if not always as severe as the most recent one.

1600 - 1800: Warming (corresponds to 1800 - 2000 of official History)

The warming of the first half of this 200 year period gave us the Industrial Revolution, with the 2nd half corresponding to what we've all been taught to call "the 20th century."

The Global Warming hysteria/hoax has been a psychological warfare operation by the "Elites" to mis-direct our attention from exactly what this article is about.

1800 - 2000: Cooling (corresponds to 2000 - 2200 of Official Timeline)

We have only just begun a 200 year cooling period..

Paintings, etc.

Have you ever noticed that almost all the paintings, drawings, carvings, etc. - every kind of visual representation - from the Dark Ages until about 300 years ago depicting historical events is allegedly anywhere from decades to centuries after the fact?

Go ahead, look!

BC / BCE

If this cycle of 200 years of warming/200 years of cooling has been stable for 2000 years, then the transition of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire would have been final 1/4th  of a 200 year cooling period.

If the cycle has been stable for over 3000 years, the collapse of the Bronze Age civilization would have been right at the end of a 200 year cooling period. As the Arctic circle descended upon N. Europe, that would have pushed people living there down into S. Europe, which would have in turn pushed (at least some of) the people living in S. Europe at the time into the Mediterranean - to become the Sea Peoples.

Thursday, June 23, 2016

The Object of Empires

Whoever has The Object is the most successful culture on the planet while they have It - but It can be taken by force.

Ancient Egypt

Obviously the Egyptians had It "first" (I don't know who made It or where It came from. The Ancient Egyptians apparently didn't know how to make one; witness them tearing out across the desert, desperate to get It back. And thereafter, their culture/civilization declined. But I'm getting ahead of myself.)

The culture of Ancient Egypt lasted for thousands of years, with accomplishments in art & architecture that still affect the world to this day.

Moses

The whole reason he went back was to get The Object. He was willing to risk his own life, and that of his children (or a fate worse than death). He had the highest level of insider knowledge, but he had to hide his identity. He wore a veil, and had someone else speak for him, because someone in the Egyptian royal court would have recognized his face and/or voice. (I'm here treating the OT account as "mythicized history", rather than completely made up as some have alleged.)

"Let my people go!" was a retcon. The rulers of our world have been committed to keeping this knowledge from the masses.

The Old Testament of the Christian bible clearly describes the dangers of this Object, and the several people who were killed simply by not following the instructions on the proper handling of It. [The OT reference to The Object as an "Ark" & - physically - a box is not necessarily Its only form/manifestation; the Templars (see below) were said to have a "head" that they used to communicate with.. something.]

Apparently, not everyone can make as good use of possession of The Object; there is no evidence of great artistic, scientific, or philosophical accomplishment by the Jews or Hebrews during the centuries they had It. (One could argue that their religion - i.e., their unique synthesis of Egyptian & Middle Eastern religions of the time - has had outsized influence on world history, but that's complicated by social control agendas of more recent authorities.)

Classical Greece

Although Athens was the place where the Greeks made their advances in everything but warfare, it was the military strength of Sparta that enabled the Athenians to explore concepts freely.

As the Babylonians sacked Jerusalem in 597 BC, and as there is no evidence to indicate the Babylonians or Persians ever had It, I deduce that It made Its way over to Greece before then. Sparta rapidly militarized sometime between 700 & 600 BC, so that fits. (How exactly the Jews or Hebrews lost It to the Greeks I haven't discovered yet.)

Sparta maintained its political independence until all of Greece was subsumed into the Roman sphere of influence, after which The Object was in Rome.

Constantine

The City had long since become deeply and thoroughly corrupt by the time Constantine became emperor of the whole Roman Empire in 306*. He knew The Object needed a safer, more stable place to rest; Byzantium could be rebuilt into something much more defensible. He renamed it after himself - Constantinople - and that's where It remained .. until the 4th crusade.

*of the official chronology. The rewriting of history, pertaining to when things happened, is a whole-nother article.

The Fourth Crusade

The Templars were digging in the temple in Jerusalem to find certain documents about The Object; maybe they theorized It existed but weren't sure, or just needed to learn how to control It. Once they found this information, they returned to France to drum up the money & papal support (they needed a good excuse to sell to the masses why a Christian army was waging a crusade against a Christian city) necessary to forcibly take It from the Eastern Roman Empire.

Either the king of France & the Pope let the Templars keep It, or didn't know they had It; either way, a later king of France decided to take It from them. Again, a story had to be told, to explain to the masses why a Christian order of knights was being attacked by the king. The king of France accused them of financial misdeeds, and the Pope (recently elected, from France, stayed there instead of moving to Rome as usual, Templars suddenly re-branded as "bad, all bad" & destroyed soon after - hmmm) piled on with allegations of heresy.

The reports of Templars being tortured "into confessing" was probably the king trying to find out where It was and/or how to use It.

The High Middle Ages and Renaissance

The history of wars raging throughout Europe from the time of the betrayal of the Templars up through the 20th century is the history of people trying to muster the military might to take The Object from whoever had It at a given time.

The Sun King

Louis XIV, king of France, had It for his reign; however, he expanded his country's reach too fast, which, combined with his own corruption, left France unable to keep it.

The Industrial Revolution

The UK got It from France at the end of the Seven Years War (aka "the French & Indian War"), and kept it until World War 2.

USA

Apparently, England gave It peacefully to the United States during or, most likely, immediately after the second world war. Perhaps they were afraid that communist China or the USSR might be able to take It from them.

This is why the US Government has been obsessed with having a military so big and powerful that the whole rest of the world combined could not conquer them.

Unfortunately, having this Thing (whatever It is/does), the USA has been able to remain very successful even as it took on more & more societal dysfunction over the past several decades. This appears to have now finally reached a breaking point.

The Future

So long as It exists on this planet and is operational, there will be war(s). The best thing to do would be to "kill" It, so that no one would have It; however, everyone who has taken It by force has apparently thought It was well-nigh indestructible.

Atlas

For those who are skeptical (but not terminally so), take a look at an historical atlas.

Kudos

I have to thank Tom of Montalk (esp. http://montalk.net/gnosis/231/4-ark-of-the-covenant-abridged; and David Wilcock, whose recent Cargo Cult article really sparked me to flash on this; and of course Graham Hancock, for his great work on the Ark & many other things.



Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Obama's SOTU "Cure for Cancer" Lie

The concept of "a cure for cancer" is popular, betraying that most people have no idea what cancer is. The cells replicate at a certain rate, according to certain environmental cues, and commit suicide ("apoptosis") when appropriate.

"Cancer" is when this system goes awry, and the cells in a tissue replicate faster than is healthy, and/or fail to die when they should.

Why does this happen? WE ALREADY KNOW WHY. We don't need billions more dollars to feed the Medical Sector.

Pollution and malnutrition are the two main causes of "cancer".

We can prevent and cure most cases of cancer with what we know right now, without any products or services of the Medical Biz (tradename: "healthcare").

A few examples:

Vitamin D3

Higher Vitamin D Intake Needed To Reduce Cancer Risk
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/archive/newsrel/health/02-22VitamanD.asp

Of course, the American Cancer Society opposes it:

New research shows vitamin D slashes risk of cancers by 77 percent; cancer industry refuses to support cancer prevention

http://www.naturalnews.com/021892_vitamin_D_American_Cancer_Society.html#ixzz3xATJhlmR


Vitamin C

The Vitamin C Foundation
https://www.vitamincfoundation.org/wiki/doku.php?id=cancer&s[]=cancer

Abram Hoffer via Doctor Yourself
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_cancer_2.html

Speaking of low-carb

Is there a role for carbohydrate restriction in the treatment and prevention of cancer?


Selenium

Life Extension Foundation

Selenium: What Forms Protect Against Cancer?

https://www.lifeextension.com/magazine/2012/ss/selenium-protect-against-cancer/page-01

Fasting

Mark Sisson of Mark's Daily Apple
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/fasting-cancer/#axzz3xAX7QRaO

also,
"The researchers say fasting “flips a regenerative switch” that prompts stem cells to create white blood cells, essentially restoring the immune system."
http://news.nationalpost.com/health/fasting-for-three-days-renews-entire-immune-system-protects-cancer-patients-remarkable-new-study-find

Pollution

Air Pollution's Impact on Cancer Is "Grossly Underestimated"
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/air-pollution-s-impact-on-cancer-is-grossly-underestimated/



Wednesday, December 23, 2015

No, Slavery Did NOT Contribute to the Success of the USA

Yes, slavery was practiced throughout the colonies and on into the States.

However, slavery was much lower incidence outside the "deep South" (the States which became the Confederacy during the Civil War).

The Northern-most States (the Yankees) wanted to force the South to give up Slavery upon the founding of the USA, but did not have the economic power to do so at that time (hence, the "3/5ths compromise").

By the time of the Civil War, the Northern-most strip of States and California had already outlawed slavery and the North had expanded West to the Great Lakes, giving them the economic power to force the South to give up slavery.*

The South was economically devastated by being forced to give up slavery, taking over a hundred years to fully recover. The rest of the country was not economically devastated by the Civil War, because slavery was not a part of their success, and never had been.

The wealth that the few rich White slave-owners in the South made was not shared with the rest of White America, and was destroyed by the Civil War.

Why?

So why has the USA been so spectacularly successful? Mainly because of four factors:

1) majority White
2) the rule of law
3) massive amount of natural resources that had not previously been exploited
4) protected by two oceans, one on either side (before the jet age)

*[Note: the USA let the South secede peacefully, but said they would get their property. When the Confederacy attacked Fort Sumter, it galvanized the rest of the USA to fight.]




Monday, December 21, 2015

The Civil Rights Movement Is a Psychological Warfare Operation

The CRM, if it ever was what it says it is, has long since become a psychwar op, the primary purpose (not the only purpose) of which is to get all White people to accept that all the bad things all Black people have ever experienced, or ever will experience (sometimes, just not getting what they want) is only because of White racism.

That is an Evil teaching, and the people who love that Evil teaching - White, Black, Asian, whatever - are Evil people.

Thursday, December 10, 2015

Jews' Ethno-Centric Ethical Double Standard

Throughout history, most Jews (an ethnic group, not just a religion) have understood the Ten Commandments to apply to Jews, not non-Jews ("Gentiles", "goyim").

For example: if a Jew lies to, cheats, or steals from a non-Jew, that is considered less unethical than if a Jew lied to, cheated, or stole from a Jew. (Note I said most Jews, not all.)

Most non-Jews - especially Christians - assume(d) that the Jews, being familiar with the Ten Commandments, would apply that ethical ("spiritual") understanding to "everyone." As you can imagine, when non-Jews who had assumed/believed that suddenly discover it is not - and never was - true, they feel betrayed.. and even angry.

The Jews - and many "Christians" - today refer to these historical incidents as "anti-Semitism" or "racism". They totally drop the context of most Jews' ethno-centric ethical double standard.

Over-represented

Jews are very over-represented (relative to their share of the U.S. population) in a few fields: the news media, the entertainment business, academia (schools), and science. Although science does take a certain amount of intelligence and focus to succeed at, and Jews are over-represented in hard science (physics, biology, etc.), they are much more over-represented in the soft sciences - psychology, sociology, etc.

This is not for the purpose of controlling our society. It is the result of a sort of Jews-only affirmative action that many (again, not all) Jews actually if un-officially practice.

However, it inevitably produces a certain, predictable, result. The Bernie Madoff story is a good example.

Bernie Madoff

When the Jews who work in the news media in the USA learned of Bernie Madoff's financial crimes, they had a much stronger reaction - psychologically and emotionally - than they did to other financial criminals being discovered at the time.

Why?

It wasn't just that Bernie was a Jew - it was that he screwed his fellow Jews. That is the number one no-no.

I am not alleging a conspiracy; no conspiracy is needed to explain it, nor even coordination. Those Jews in the MSM "naturally" found the story of a Jew screwing other Jews much more "compelling" than Jews or non-Jews screwing non-Jews, or even non-Jews screwing Jews. So, they covered it much more than many other financial criminals.

Over-represented, Part 2

Jews are also very over-represented in promoting, through their positions in news, entertainment, academia, and the soft sciences: open borders (for the USA, but not for Israel), multi-culturalism, Feminism, gay marriage, trans-gendered whatever, the White privilege lie, the male privilege lie, and the campus rape-culture hysteria (lack of evidence means get nowhere with police).

Notice a pattern?

Response

So, what should our response be, as a country? Excuse, because "most persecuted"/"God's chosen"?

Because of the "troll" phenomenon, I have to be very clear. I am not talking about camps or killing. Certainly not.

But we can tell the truth of everything I have just described, in public and private, no matter how anyone reacts. Truth feeds Good, lies feed Evil.

We can also enforce our borders, and prosecute the trillions in financial fraud (another area where Jews are over-represented).

Racist

I don't care whether it's "racist." Is it true?

Wednesday, December 02, 2015

Me for President!

I am announcing today my candidacy for President of the United States of America.

Why You Should Support Me for President of the USA

I would rather die than lie.

Truth feeds good. Lies feed Evil, no matter who tells them or why. There is no such thing as lying in the service of the Good.

I will not tell the lies that any person or group loves, no matter how I might be rewarded for doing so, no matter how I might be punished for not doing so.

I have refused to lie my entire adult life, and I have been punished severely for it.

You should support me for POTUS in 2016 for that reason alone, no matter whether you may agree or disagree with me about anything else.

My 10 Point Plan
  1. Prosecute the financial fraud in the Financial Sector.
  2. Prosecute the science fraud in the Medical Sector, and that related to the Global Warming Hoax.
  3. Prosecute all living former Presidents of the US, everyone who ever served in any of their cabinets, all current members of the US Congress, and all current members of the US Supreme Court for their many crimes, including Treason. If we can get any of them on Treason, we will seek the death penalty.
  4. Eliminate all subsidies to wheat, corn, soy, sugar, oil (petroleum), and banks.
  5. Tax Reform
  6. Enforce our borders: spoil the milk to reverse the tide.
  7. Remove the legal requirement for all employers to pretend that the distribution of inherited qualities is equal between men and women, or between the races.
  8. We must have a single-payer national healthcare system; that we don't is ridiculous, indefensible, and evil.
  9. No-one who has dual-citizenship with the USA and any other country should be allowed to hold elected or appointed office in the US Government.
  10. We must stop treating any country that has Sharia law as a friend or ally.  
Corrupt

We are an occupied country. Our country has been hijacked from within. 

"Our" government is deeply and thoroughly corrupt. You, my fellow Americans, will get scandal fatigue after I become President, as I will stop protecting all the lies and other crimes by numerous insiders.

It won't be pleasant, but we who have a conscience need for justice to be done for mental health.

Switch Focus

I know some will say that I have no realistic chance at actually becoming President. I say we need to switch our focus from what's possible to what's necessary.

Donald Trump has said some right things, but his success so far has been despite some very serious problems with him. He has had only weak competition until now. He is vulnerable.

Most Americans want real change. The money and people power are available... for the right person.

I am the right man for the job of US President at this very important moment in the history of our planet. I have the intelligence, knowledge on a wide array of subjects, values, morals, and character.

I am not a savior. I can't do it for you, and I can't do it without you. Together we will take our country back!

#TruthVsFreedom

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Yes, Steve Jobs Was A Sociopath

If you read one or more of the great books on the subject of sociopathy/psychopathy (e.g., The Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley; Without Conscience by Robert Hare; The Sociopath Next Door by Martha Stout) and then read The Little Kingdom by Michael Moritz, the fact of Steve Jobs' psychopathic personality is undeniably obvious.

Some of Steve's "friends" were un-happy with Walter Isaacson's bio of Jobs (apparently told the truth too unvarnished/didn't spin him in a flattering light), so they cooperated with another author to get a different take on him out there.

Ironically, that book makes his sociopathy even clearer:

What he learned from the Pixar experience - especially the success of their first movie, Toy Story - was that if he could just restrain himself from interfering in the greatness-creators' work enough, he could prevent himself from preventing them from creating the greatness they were capable of; and, that fed his malignant narcissism much better than the string of failures from the Lisa through the Mac to NeXT Computer did.

He was not a genius and not a visionary.

Thursday, March 05, 2015

Proposed 10 Question Voting Test

The test should be easy enough that there is no excuse for not passing (from the POV of approx. 51% of Americans), but yet eliminate those who can't think, or refuse to find out basic highly relevant facts.

1) Add: something that requires carrying - e.g, 17 + 8

2) Subtract: two double digits - e.g., 59 - 17

3) Multiply: a double digit times a single digit - e.g., 54 x 6

4) Divide: a double digit divided by a single digit - e.g., 72 / 9

5) Locate the USA on a map of the world

6) Locate China, Israel, Russia on a map of the world (any two)

7) Name the current President

8) Name your current Governor

9) Name your current Mayor

10) Name one of your two Senators


This will have to be on computer of course. The math questions should be different each person each time.

Get more than one wrong, you should not be allowed to vote, or hold elected (or appointed?) office.

Each person gets one chance to pass the test each election.

This would significantly improve the quality of government in this country.

"Elitist" (racist, sexist, etc.) : Don't those of us who can pass this test have a right to defend ourselves - and our civilization - against those who cannot? There is no justification for letting anyone who cannot pass this test vote; they will be too easily manipulated.


Saturday, December 27, 2014

Try These 10 Things Before TRT

Considering Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT)? First ask yourself if you're doing these:

1) ZINC. If you are not deficient in zinc, taking a supplement will not raise your T. However, most men in the USA (and Western Civ generally) are deficient in zinc. You need zinc to make T, and zinc inhibits the activity of the enzyme (aromatase) that converts T into estrogen.

Total intake of zinc, from food and supplements combined, should be less than 100 mg per day. Most men will not get any further benefit beyond about 50 mg per day from food and supps combined. If you take a supp, have it between dinner and bed.

2) LIFT. Forget "cardio" forever. You do need to walk a few hours a week, but it should be slow and low-stress, to work food around the corners of your intestines. It's not about burning calories.

You must lift weights at least one day per week (but never two days in a row - recovery's where you make your gains). Your T "serum level" (the amount in you blood) drops post-workout, because your muscles used T to do the work, now suck T out of blood to replenish, your pituitary gland reads the drop in serum T and signals your balls to make more. More muscle = more T.

You can get a great lifting session with just a bodyweight workout. You don't need a "weight set" or a gym membership. (If you like lifting actual iron, or going to the gym, that's fine of course.)

If you are out of shape, start small and increase slowly.

3) PROTEIN. The standard formula for how much protein you need is: your body weight in kilograms is the number of grams of protein you need each day. Normally that's true, but for at least four - and up to 24 - hours after lifting, you should double that rate of intake. Your baseline remains, plus now you temporarily have the additional need of your skeletal muscles recovering from the workout. If you're not going to give your muscles as much protein as they can use, why are you even bothering to lift?!

4) SLEEP. The four basic rules of healthy sleep are: go dim at least a half hour before bed, in bed before midnight, sleep in darkness and quiet, don't get up until after dawn.  Chronic sleep deprivation can lower your T.

5) REST. In addition to getting enough sleep each night, you should have at least one day a week of complete rest. Ideally, lift the day before to maximize benefits of both.

6) FAT. The low fat diet has been a disaster. Your body needs dietary fat to function properly, and the fat it needs is saturated (and mono-unsaturated) animal fat, not that "vegetable oil" crap.

You also need naturally saturated organic (the pollution's in the fat) animal fat specifically to make T. (Never eat high carb and high fat at the same meal, of course.)

7) VITAMIN D. For historical reasons this "nutrient" is called a vitamin, but is actually a steroid hormone. You can make it from sunlight, but the UV-B necessary to make vit D is only available in the temperate zone from 10am - 2pm in Summer, 11am - 1pm Spring and Fall, and not in Winter. Also, UV-B is blocked by smog and clouds (but UV-A, which can give you skin cancer, isn't).

8) MAGNESIUM. Most Americans - male and female - are deficient in magnesium. Whereas calcium helps muscles contract, mag helps muscles relax. This can help you get into phase IV, the deepest most restful stage of sleep. As noted, better sleep can boost your T. Limit calcium - from food and supps - to morning and/or afternoon; get mag after dinner.

9) LOSE THE GUT. Abdominal fat manufactures aromatase, the enzyme that converts T into E. Should you go low carb or low fat? It depends...

10) IODINE. You need iodine (and tyrosine) to make thyroid hormone. Most Americans get enough, but if you don't, low thyroid will decrease T. (You also need selenium - just a little, don't go crazy - to convert thyroid hormone into its active form.)

If, after all that, you decide to go ahead with TRT anyway.. still keep doing all 10 of these things, as they will support both health and fitness!

Tuesday, November 04, 2014

What Does It Means to Live in "a Free Will Universe"?


You can't just choose the truth, or to be Good, or to grow your awareness, once and have the decision set.

The universe demands you make the choice over and over and over.

How many times do you have to choose? No one, not even yourself, will know that until you "graduate."

Every time you are on one path, and you choose the other path, you lose ground. You keep choosing the new path until you have made up the ground you lost, and then switch again.

Running to stand still.

No wonder you're so tired. No wonder the road seems too long, the obstacle insurmountable, the task un-accomplish-able.

The universe doesn't make the choice for you. It wants to give you the chance to try both paths, as much as you need to, so that whichever you end up with, you can be sure it's the one you really want.

That's what it means to live in “a free will universe.”

Thursday, October 30, 2014

How to Prevent Back Pain in Four Easy Steps

Short Answer: You stand up wrong

Longer Answer:

There are many explanations for why so many people in our society have low back pain; the most popular is that all the time spent sitting is “killing” (some people say “ruining”) your low back. A related meme/theme is that you need to practice better posture when sitting and/or standing.

The remedy is said to be standing more, with some even proposing the “standing desk”.

Well, that just smacks of the same condescending, Puritanical BS as the “lazy gluttons” explanation for the Obesity Epidemic – it is the blamer indulging himself in feeling superior.

I say the problem isn't how much time you spend sitting, it's how you stand up from a sitting position.

How You Stand Up

  1. You are sitting all the way back in the chair (or couch), your back supported by the back of the chair.
  2. You lean forward from where you are – the weight of your body behind your feet – and , with your back extended, pull/push your way up into a standing position.

Every time you get up that way, you hurt your low back by making it do work in the extended position.

How You Should Stand Up

  1. You are sitting all the way back in the chair (or couch), your back supported by the back of the chair.
  2. You use your hands and feet to scoot your rear end to the edge of the chair.
  3. Inhale as you pull your feet back to you (if necessary) and lean forward
  4. Exhale as you stand straight up in one swift, fluid motion

The Operative Principle

The operative principle here is to get the weight of your torso directly over your heels before you stand up. Also, try to minimize the time spent between the sitting and standing positions.

In this way, you stop damaging your low back every time you get up from a sitting position, thereby giving your back a chance to heal.

Try it today, and you could start seeing results as early as immediately, all for the low low price of zero dollars!

Monday, October 27, 2014

The Ferguson FAQ

Q: Did 6' tall, 300 pound Mike Brown have the right to violently rob a convenience store?
A: No.

Q: Did the QuickTrip have the right to report to the police that they had been robbed.
A; Yes.

Q: Did the police have the right to investigate the claim by the QT that they had been robbed?
A: Yes.

Q: Did MB have the right to physically attack the police officer for daring to investigate his (MB's) robbery of the QT?
A: No.

Q: Did the police officer have the right to kill his attacker in self defense?
A: Of course, all humans have that right.

Q: Did the protestors have a right to riot?
A: No.

Q: Why did the protestors riot?
A: Because White and Black Liberals (SJW) have institutionalized the doctrine that the distribution of inherited qualities is equal between the races, leaving White racism as the only explanation for the disparity of outcomes.

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Carlos Castaneda and The Flinch

Carlos Castaneda was a man who wrote a series of novels in the genre "Magical Realism", in which he was taught the secrets of life by a Mexican Indian (Yaqui) shaman named Juan Matus.

Some of the things Juan taught Carlos:

  • A man who wants to become Impeccable sets before himself an obstacle that is almost insurmountable, so as to force himself to become impeccable to overcome it
  • Become aware of how you are leaking energy, so you can stop doing that
  • Normal people, when they encounter a Petty Tyrant, piss and moan, and wish the tyrant was not so petty. When a Man Of Knowledge encounters a Petty Tyrant, he (the Man Of Knowledge, not the Petty Tyrant) rejoices, glad of the gift the Universe has given him - the opportunity to practice Discipline
  • Discipline is not about getting up at five AM and splashing water on your face. Discipline is being able to look at what reality actually turns out to be - as that may differ from what you wanted or expected - without flinching

More:

Carlos' books, or   http://www.prismagems.com/castaneda/

and

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13159280-the-flinch