Thursday, June 23, 2016

The Object of Empires

Whoever has The Object is the most successful culture on the planet while they have It - but It can be taken by force.

Ancient Egypt

Obviously the Egyptians had It "first" (I don't know who made It or where It came from. The Ancient Egyptians apparently didn't know how to make one; witness them tearing out across the desert, desperate to get It back. And thereafter, their culture/civilization declined. But I'm getting ahead of myself.)

The culture of Ancient Egypt lasted for thousands of years, with accomplishments in art & architecture that still affect the world to this day.


The whole reason he went back was to get The Object. He was willing to risk his own life, and that of his children (or a fate worse than death). He had the highest level of insider knowledge, but he had to hide his identity. He wore a veil, and had someone else speak for him, because someone in the Egyptian royal court would have recognized his face and/or voice. (I'm here treating the OT account as "mythicized history", rather than completely made up as some have alleged.)

"Let my people go!" was a retcon. The rulers of our world have been committed to keeping this knowledge from the masses.

The Old Testament of the Christian bible clearly describes the dangers of this Object, and the several people who were killed simply by not following the instructions on the proper handling of It. [The OT reference to The Object as an "Ark" & - physically - a box is not necessarily Its only form/manifestation; the Templars (see below) were said to have a "head" that they used to communicate with.. something.]

Apparently, not everyone can make as good use of possession of The Object; there is no evidence of great artistic, scientific, or philosophical accomplishment by the Jews or Hebrews during the centuries they had It. (One could argue that their religion - i.e., their unique synthesis of Egyptian & Middle Eastern religions of the time - has had outsized influence on world history, but that's complicated by social control agendas of more recent authorities.)

Classical Greece

Although Athens was the place where the Greeks made their advances in everything but warfare, it was the military strength of Sparta that enabled the Athenians to explore concepts freely.

As the Babylonians sacked Jerusalem in 597 BC, and as there is no evidence to indicate the Babylonians or Persians ever had It, I deduce that It made Its way over to Greece before then. Sparta rapidly militarized sometime between 700 & 600 BC, so that fits. (How exactly the Jews or Hebrews lost It to the Greeks I haven't discovered yet.)

Sparta maintained its political independence until all of Greece was subsumed into the Roman sphere of influence, after which The Object was in Rome.


The City had long since become deeply and thoroughly corrupt by the time Constantine became emperor of the whole Roman Empire in 306*. He knew The Object needed a safer, more stable place to rest; Byzantium could be rebuilt into something much more defensible. He renamed it after himself - Constantinople - and that's where It remained .. until the 4th crusade.

*of the official chronology. The rewriting of history, pertaining to when things happened, is a whole-nother article.

The Fourth Crusade

The Templars were digging in the temple in Jerusalem to find certain documents about The Object; maybe they theorized It existed but weren't sure, or just needed to learn how to control It. Once they found this information, they returned to France to drum up the money & papal support (they needed a good excuse to sell to the masses why a Christian army was waging a crusade against a Christian city) necessary to forcibly take It from the Eastern Roman Empire.

Either the king of France & the Pope let the Templars keep It, or didn't know they had It; either way, a later king of France decided to take It from them. Again, a story had to be told, to explain to the masses why a Christian order of knights was being attacked by the king. The king of France accused them of financial misdeeds, and the Pope (recently elected, from France, stayed there instead of moving to Rome as usual, Templars suddenly re-branded as "bad, all bad" & destroyed soon after - hmmm) piled on with allegations of heresy.

The reports of Templars being tortured "into confessing" was probably the king trying to find out where It was and/or how to use It.

The High Middle Ages and Renaissance

The history of wars raging throughout Europe from the time of the betrayal of the Templars up through the 20th century is the history of people trying to muster the military might to take The Object from whoever had It at a given time.

The Sun King

Louis XIV, king of France, had It for his reign; however, he expanded his country's reach too fast, which, combined with his own corruption, left France unable to keep it.

The Industrial Revolution

The UK got It from France at the end of the Seven Years War (aka "the French & Indian War"), and kept it until World War 2.


Apparently, England gave It peacefully to the United States during or, most likely, immediately after the second world war. Perhaps they were afraid that communist China or the USSR might be able to take It from them.

This is why the US Government has been obsessed with having a military so big and powerful that the whole rest of the world combined could not conquer them.

Unfortunately, having this Thing (whatever It is/does), the USA has been able to remain very successful even as it took on more & more societal dysfunction over the past several decades. This appears to have now finally reached a breaking point.

The Future

So long as It exists on this planet and is operational, there will be war(s). The best thing to do would be to "kill" It, so that no one would have It; however, everyone who has taken It by force has apparently thought It was well-nigh indestructible.


For those who are skeptical (but not terminally so), take a look at an historical atlas.


I have to thank Tom of Montalk (esp.; and David Wilcock, whose recent Cargo Cult article really sparked me to flash on this; and of course Graham Hancock, for his great work on the Ark & many other things.

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Obama's SOTU "Cure for Cancer" Lie

The concept of "a cure for cancer" is popular, betraying that most people have no idea what cancer is. The cells replicate at a certain rate, according to certain environmental cues, and commit suicide ("apoptosis") when appropriate.

"Cancer" is when this system goes awry, and the cells in a tissue replicate faster than is healthy, and/or fail to die when they should.

Why does this happen? WE ALREADY KNOW WHY. We don't need billions more dollars to feed the Medical Sector.

Pollution and malnutrition are the two main causes of "cancer".

We can prevent and cure most cases of cancer with what we know right now, without any products or services of the Medical Biz (tradename: "healthcare").

A few examples:

Vitamin D3

Higher Vitamin D Intake Needed To Reduce Cancer Risk

Of course, the American Cancer Society opposes it:

New research shows vitamin D slashes risk of cancers by 77 percent; cancer industry refuses to support cancer prevention

Vitamin C

The Vitamin C Foundation

Abram Hoffer via Doctor Youself

Speaking of low-carb

Is There a Role for Carbohydrate Restriction in the Treatment and Prevention of Cancer?


The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine


Mark Sisson of Mark's Daily Apple

"The researchers say fasting “flips a regenerative switch” that prompts stem cells to create white blood cells, essentially restoring the immune system."


Air Pollution's Impact on Cancer Is "Grossly Underestimated"

UPDATE March 5 2016

Five Important Facts About Cancer That Nobody Ever Talks About

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

No, Slavery Did NOT Contribute to the Success of the USA

Yes, slavery was practiced throughout the colonies and on into the States.

However, slavery was much lower incidence outside the "deep South" (the States which became the Confederacy during the Civil War).

The Northern-most States (the Yankees) wanted to force the South to give up Slavery upon the founding of the USA, but did not have the economic power to do so at that time (hence, the "3/5ths compromise").

By the time of the Civil War, the Northern-most strip of States and California had already outlawed slavery and the North had expanded West to the Great Lakes, giving them the economic power to force the South to give up slavery.*

The South was economically devastated by being forced to give up slavery, taking over a hundred years to fully recover. The rest of the country was not economically devastated by the Civil War, because slavery was not a part of their success, and never had been.

The wealth that the few rich White slave-owners in the South made was not shared with the rest of White America, and was destroyed by the Civil War.


So why has the USA been so spectacularly successful? Mainly because of four factors:

1) majority White
2) the rule of law
3) massive amount of natural resources that had not previously been exploited
4) protected by two oceans, one on either side (before the jet age)

*[Note: the USA let the South secede peacefully, but said they would get their property. When the Confederacy attacked Fort Sumter, it galvanized the rest of the USA to fight.]

Monday, December 21, 2015

The Civil Rights Movement Is a Psychological Warfare Operation

The CRM, if it ever was what it says it is, has long since become a psychwar op, the primary purpose (not the only purpose) of which is to get all White people to accept that all the bad things all Black people have ever experienced, or ever will experience (sometimes, just not getting what they want) is only because of White racism.

That is an Evil teaching, and the people who love that Evil teaching - White, Black, Asian, whatever - are Evil people.

Thursday, December 10, 2015

Jews' Ethno-Centric Ethical Double Standard

Throughout history, most Jews (an ethnic group, not just a religion) have understood the Ten Commandments to apply to Jews, not non-Jews ("Gentiles", "goyim").

For example: if a Jew lies to, cheats, or steals from a non-Jew, that is considered less unethical than if a Jew lied to, cheated, or stole from a Jew. (Note I said most Jews, not all.)

Most non-Jews - especially Christians - assume(d) that the Jews, being familiar with the Ten Commandments, would apply that ethical ("spiritual") understanding to "everyone." As you can imagine, when non-Jews who had assumed/believed that suddenly discover it is not - and never was - true, they feel betrayed.. and even angry.

The Jews - and many "Christians" - today refer to these historical incidents as "anti-Semitism" or "racism". They totally drop the context of most Jews' ethno-centric ethical double standard.


Jews are very over-represented (relative to their share of the U.S. population) in a few fields: the news media, the entertainment business, academia (schools), and science. Although science does take a certain amount of intelligence and focus to succeed at, and Jews are over-represented in hard science (physics, biology, etc.), they are much more over-represented in the soft sciences - psychology, sociology, etc.

This is not for the purpose of controlling our society. It is the result of a sort of Jews-only affirmative action that many (again, not all) Jews actually if un-officially practice.

However, it inevitably produces a certain, predictable, result. The Bernie Madoff story is a good example.

Bernie Madoff

When the Jews who work in the news media in the USA learned of Bernie Madoff's financial crimes, they had a much stronger reaction - psychologically and emotionally - than they did to other financial criminals being discovered at the time.


It wasn't just that Bernie was a Jew - it was that he screwed his fellow Jews. That is the number one no-no.

I am not alleging a conspiracy; no conspiracy is needed to explain it, nor even coordination. Those Jews in the MSM "naturally" found the story of a Jew screwing other Jews much more "compelling" than Jews or non-Jews screwing non-Jews, or even non-Jews screwing Jews. So, they covered it much more than many other financial criminals.

Over-represented, Part 2

Jews are also very over-represented in promoting, through their positions in news, entertainment, academia, and the soft sciences: open borders (for the USA, but not for Israel), multi-culturalism, Feminism, gay marriage, trans-gendered whatever, the White privilege lie, the male privilege lie, and the campus rape-culture hysteria (lack of evidence means get nowhere with police).

Notice a pattern?


So, what should our response be, as a country? Excuse, because "most persecuted"/"God's chosen"?

Because of the "troll" phenomenon, I have to be very clear. I am not talking about camps or killing. Certainly not.

But we can tell the truth of everything I have just described, in public and private, no matter how anyone reacts. Truth feeds Good, lies feed Evil.

We can also enforce our borders, and prosecute the trillions in financial fraud (another area where Jews are over-represented).


I don't care whether it's "racist." Is it true?

Wednesday, December 02, 2015

Me for President!

I am announcing today my candidacy for President of the United States of America.

Why You Should Support Me for President of the USA

I would rather die than lie.

Truth feeds good. Lies feed Evil, no matter who tells them or why. There is no such thing as lying in the service of the Good.

I will not tell the lies that any person or group loves, no matter how I might be rewarded for doing so, no matter how I might be punished for not doing so.

I have refused to lie my entire adult life, and I have been punished severely for it.

You should support me for POTUS in 2016 for that reason alone, no matter whether you may agree or disagree with me about anything else.

My 10 Point Plan
  1. Prosecute the financial fraud in the Financial Sector.
  2. Prosecute the science fraud in the Medical Sector, and that related to the Global Warming Hoax.
  3. Prosecute all living former Presidents of the US, everyone who ever served in any of their cabinets, all current members of the US Congress, and all current members of the US Supreme Court for their many crimes, including Treason. If we can get any of them on Treason, we will seek the death penalty.
  4. Eliminate all subsidies to wheat, corn, soy, sugar, oil (petroleum), and banks.
  5. Tax Reform
  6. Enforce our borders: spoil the milk to reverse the tide.
  7. Remove the legal requirement for all employers to pretend that the distribution of inherited qualities is equal between men and women, or between the races.
  8. We must have a single-payer national healthcare system; that we don't is ridiculous, indefensible, and evil.
  9. No-one who has dual-citizenship with the USA and any other country should be allowed to hold elected or appointed office in the US Government.
  10. We must stop treating any country that has Sharia law as a friend or ally.  

We are an occupied country. Our country has been hijacked from within. 

"Our" government is deeply and thoroughly corrupt. You, my fellow Americans, will get scandal fatigue after I become President, as I will stop protecting all the lies and other crimes by numerous insiders.

It won't be pleasant, but we who have a conscience need for justice to be done for mental health.

Switch Focus

I know some will say that I have no realistic chance at actually becoming President. I say we need to switch our focus from what's possible to what's necessary.

Donald Trump has said some right things, but his success so far has been despite some very serious problems with him. He has had only weak competition until now. He is vulnerable.

Most Americans want real change. The money and people power are available... for the right person.

I am the right man for the job of US President at this very important moment in the history of our planet. I have the intelligence, knowledge on a wide array of subjects, values, morals, and character.

I am not a savior. I can't do it for you, and I can't do it without you. Together we will take our country back!


Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Yes, Steve Jobs Was A Psychopath

If you read one or more of the great books on the subject of psychopathy (e.g., The Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley; Without Conscience by Robert Hare; The Sociopath Next Door by Martha Stout) and then read The Little Kingdom by Michael Moritz, the fact of Steve Jobs' psychopathic personality is undeniably obvious.

Some of Steve's "friends" were un-happy with Walter Isaacson's bio of Jobs (apparently told the truth too unvarnished/didn't spin him in a flattering light), so they cooperated with another author to get a different take on him out there.

Ironically, that book makes his psychopathy even clearer:

What he learned from the Pixar experience - especially the success of their first movie, Toy Story - was that if he could just restrain himself from interfering in the greatness-creators work enough, he could prevent himself from preventing them from creating the greatness they were capable of; and, that fed his malignant narcissism much better than the string of failures from the Lisa through the Mac to NeXT Computer did.

He was not a genius and not a visionary.